Monday, December 16, 2013

Heroes

I posted a comment on the Friendly Atheist, which I occasionally (ridiculously) do, under one of two aliases.  As usual, my opinion was not only condemned, but I was condemned, even though no one knew who I was.  No big deal, in a way, except, as I told another atheist, who tend to be prickly.  We disagree a lot.  We look down on theists.  We're obnoxious.

The great atheist heroes of the ages are not necessarily my heroes.  I admire Michael Shermer, Hemant Mehta, and sometimes Sam Harris.  Who else?  Dawkins.  I'm not sure.  Hitchens?  Definitely not.  Atheist feminist bloggers?  None so far.

The good thing about the experience is that I've decided to revive this blog, to comment more on the stupidity I see in the atheist world, to research and read more, and to write more posts.  I've also decided to disable comments, because commenting can take place on other blogs.  I get wrapped up in Twitter wars and negative commenting, but I don't want to do that here.  I want to be honest, and I might censor myself if I think a post will receive criticism.  If someone wants to comment, they can do that on their own blogs.  Trackbacks will be allowed.

I am re-reading the only atheist tome I encountered as a teenager--Why I am not a Christian by Bertrand Russell.  I'm going to re-read what I remember as idiocy written by C.S. Lewis.  I'm going to comment on theists and atheists, the Bible and other religious writings, and stop being the cowardly atheist I've been thus far (although my vehicle does sport an atheist bumper sticker).  

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Christian brag

Last month, my neighbor died.  She was in her 80s, and she'd been ill, although she was still plugging along.  I delivered a eulogy at her funeral, and I couldn't stop crying.  The funeral was a strange, low key affair at the local senior center, with recordings of my friend singing and playing the guitar, and everyone from her brother to her fellow band members playing and singing tributes.

Then this old lady got up who barely knew my neighbor, and she told us that Clara was now in heaven, and she knew this because she'd read the Bible 87 times.

I turned to my mother and said, "So that's the lady who brags about reading the Bible."  My mother nodded. I'd proofread a biography of this person's life, and all she could talk about was God, not about her family or what she'd done that was worthwhile--just God.

Eighty-seven times.  She wears it like a badge.  She acts as though that gives her special insight.  She brags about her knowledge.  If she weren't so old, and if she weren't talking about the Bible, I can imagine someone slapping her across the face for her arrogance.

When I grew up in a church, humility was a big deal.  You didn't go around bragging about having read the Bible however many times.  You just did it.  You read it in Sunday school; you read it at bedtime; you read it so many times, sometimes all the way through, sometimes in snippets.  You'd try to memorize verses, but not to win a prize, but because they meant something to you.  Thus, when I'm decluttering, I find myself reciting "Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth..."; when I find clothes with holes, I find myself singing "Holy, holy, holy."; when I want to stay in my room and avoid the world, I remind myself of the parable of the talents.  If you asked me right now to preach a sermon on any topic, I could do it without any preparation, because it was ground into my brain.  That's not bragging; it's just a fact.

Hypocrisy is an important word to Christians, and hypocrisy is something you want to avoid.  You want to be honest, forthright, and good.  You don't want to be like that woman, getting up before a crowd of people, bragging about how many times you've read the Bible, and giving a "message" that my friend is in a "better place" and I "will see her again."

I cried throughout my eulogy, and maybe people were surprised because they didn't know how much Clara meant to me, but at least I wasn't a phony old lady who met her once.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

What it's like to be the working poor

Although I have a master's degree and a half, I've spent most of my career in underemployment.  When I was unable to obtain a decent job during this latest economic depression (I quit a soul-sucking job that paid little), I gave up, substitute taught for a year, and retired.

When you retire early, you take a lower rate of retirement, but in my state, our public employees' retirement also offers health insurance, so we are insured again at the moment--my sons until they reach age 25.  I still work at one part-time job as an independent contractor; I write occasional book reviews for pay; and I still get child support until next July, when my son turns 19.  I settled for a lower-than-legal amount of child support because it was easier than arguing with my ex-husband, and although he pays it late every month, at least he still pays it.

Both sons are in college now, attending with a combination of Pell grants, modest savings from jobs, a few scholarships (even the salutatorian failed to get any truly cushy full ride scholarships--oh, well), and student loans.  They'll both graduate with debt, but their father says that if the market improves, he'll sell one of his four houses to help them out at some point.  At the moment, though, he gives them nothing.

To give an example of how meager my income has been, during all of their school years, we were eligible for free and reduced lunches except for two years (interestingly, the income eligibility guidelines are online for many years here:  http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/governance/notices/iegs/iegs.htm).  Most of those years, we were a family of three, although for the last five years, there was always an extra teenager here--one was a refugee from an abusive mom (and from Mormonism); another stayed here because he didn't like his stepfather of the week.  I fed them, but the only rent they paid was helping with chores.

One of my sons has asthma, and he has been the trickiest to help without insurance because he needs medication.  It costs too much to get a health checkup, but fortunately, they offer sports physicals for $30, so even though he doesn't participate in sports, that's how he'd get a checkup and a prescription.  His medication cost between $35 and $85 for a refill.  For two years, he went without a checkup because the physician's assistant we'd seen was kind enough to renew the prescription when the pharmacy called him.  This last year, we took advantage of the free medication service offered by some drug companies, so he was able to get a three-month supply at a time.

Once a year, I get a fairly large tax refund, based on earned income credit.  The tax refund is spent like this:  1)  dentists  2) optometrists 3) new shoes, a pair of pants, underwear, socks, and two t-shirts for each son 4) belated Christmas presents 5) debt reduction and 6) living expenses.  A decent tax refund might last us into May or June, helping with high winter heating bills (I could average those, but it's always a relief to pay less in the summer, so I pay the higher rate in the winter).

I've visited doctors for myself three times in the last ten years.  Once, I requested a tranquilizer so I could attend my sons' band concerts (I have agoraphobia & social anxiety).  The visit cost so much that I never did fill the prescription.  Once, I was seeing spots before my eyes.  The doctor ordered blood tests and found out I was low on potassium and other essential elements/vitamins.  He ordered follow-up blood tests, but the first ones were so expensive, even with insurance, that I never went back; instead, I tried to improve my diet and I take an occasional multivitamin and the spots went away.  The third visit was a month ago, where the doctor (who was recommended) didn't seem to care, and so learned almost nothing about me.  It was a hellish experience for a recluse, but it was covered by insurance.  I may never go back, even though I have insurance.  Or maybe I'll hear about another doctor who's worth a try.

In Colorado, most towns offer a version of the 9 Health Fair, where you can get inexpensive blood tests and other health screenings.  Unfortunately, you have to wait in line for hours to receive these benefits.  I tried it once, but my anxiety over standing in line, then entering a room crowded with people got the better of me.  I left that year without getting any health screenings, and I've never tried again.

All of our immunizations take place at the county health facility, a 5-minute walk from my house.  Immunizations generally cost $10 to $15 and some are free.  A few years ago, I stepped on a nail, so I went to the county health office for a tetanus booster.  They were closed, attending a special immunization festival of some sort in a town 60 miles away.  I didn't want to drive that far, so I went to the local doctor's office.  They said that they couldn't squeeze me in for a tetanus shot, so I'd have to go to the emergency room.  That visit would cost me $185, so I drove the 60 miles for the $10 tetanus shot.

Last year, as my son was climbing down the wooden ladder from his room, he got a splinter under his fingernail, which went all the way to the base of the nail.  I knew I couldn't extract it, so we drove to my mother's house, but she was unable to extract it.  The next step was the after-hours clinic, which is supposed to be my town's inexpensive alternative for poor people with minor problems.  The nurse took one look at the splinter and said that we'd have to go to the emergency room.  My son was becoming faint from the pain, so there wasn't an alternative.  I left him there because I had to work, but I sent my daughter to sit with him.  Maybe if I'd been there, I would have found out that you can get a 50% discount if you pay half the bill within 15 days.  They gave him a local anesthetic, cut out the splinter, and he came home.  When I received the bill,  it was $866.  I paid it off in hundreds, seventy-fives, and fifties, over a period of 10 months.  Now we have insurance, but it isn't the best insurance.  It's supposed to pay 20% of the costs for emergency care, and there's a $6,000 deductible per person ($12,000 for the whole family), so I'm not really sure how much it would have helped with the cost of the splinter removal.

A 19-year-old friend of my sons works part-time (the only job he's been able to get) and suffered from a health emergency that cost several thousand dollars. He used the option to pay within 15 days, so he reduced the bill by half, but it wiped out his savings, so now he's back at square one trying to build up his savings so he can attend community college part-time.

What's good about health care in this country for the working poor?  Not much.  There's now a "free" clinic in my neighborhood, but to use it at a discount, I would have to make an appointment with the financial person in that town sixty miles away, drive to see her, and fill out copious forms.  I know this because my daughter followed this path, which is too difficult for me.

Someone in my town wrote a letter about how outrageous it is that students get free and reduced lunches, yet they have new shoes.  When I read that letter, I had just purchased my sons their new shoes for the year, and I shook my head at her ignorance.  It's sort of like Romney's ignorance when he says that we provide free care for poor people when they have a medical emergency.

Both sons needed braces.  My ex-husband actually pitched in and paid for the first son's braces, but I paid for the second at the rate of $157 a month, but at least they had a financing program, so it worked out even during the years that we didn't have dental insurance.

I haven't been to a dentist in a decade, and there's one at that free clinic, also a five-minute walk from me, so I've been plotting how I could get over there now that I have dental insurance.  With insurance, I shouldn't have to drive the sixty miles to go through the paperwork gauntlet, so that should help.  So far, though, I haven't been able to figure it out.  Does anyone provide a safety net for mentally ill people who are afraid of dentists? I wouldn't even know how to find out.  I don't have friends, so there's no one to ask for help, but hey, I'm smart, so I'll probably figure it out before I die from an infection.

In contrast, my daughter is attending school in the UK for a year, working on her master's degree (she's paying for it with thousands of dollars in loans, but it's still cheaper than attending a master's program here).  She's able to use the national health system because she's staying for a year, so she went for a checkup (her first in a long time), and they gave her a physical and excellent advice on asthma management, and when she asked how much it cost, they replied that it was free.  Free health care.  Yes, you have to pay for it with taxes, but imagine never having to worry about how to pay for a splinter.

After looking at Mitt Romney's 2010 tax return, I understand why he doesn't understand poverty. He doesn't even have to work to make money. He's never experienced the balancing act that comes from not having enough--how you have to use a patchwork of services to make sure your kids can see a dentist, get glasses, eat, get needed medications, visit the doctor, and still get a new pair of shoes every year, let alone the struggle to get them into college.  He didn't attend public schools, so he has no idea that many public schools are actually good--in fact, that's a message that no one ever states.  No one ever says, hey, this is what's right with public education.  The lives of the working poor are more complex than Romney could imagine.

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Leviticus 20:22-27

Since my random Bible verse generator spit out Leviticus last week, this week I’ll finish discussing the rest of Leviticus 20, verses 22 to 27.

These verses are mainly concerned with God’s desire for people to keep true to the covenant he made with them.  If they obey the laws, they will possess “a land flowing with milk and honey.”  If they break the laws, they may be “vomit[ed] out” of the land.  The way to set yourself apart from other people is to eat only things which are clean, not unclean.  Thus, verse 25 says “Do not defile yourselves by any animal or bird or anything that moves along the ground.”  There’s more about what you can eat and what you should avoid elsewhere in Leviticus (chapter 11), but here’s an interesting verse that no one pays attention to:

Leviticus 20:27  A man or woman who is a medium or spiritist among you must be put to death.  You are to stone them; their blood will be on their own heads.

Think of all the mediums we put up with in modern life, from Sylvia Browne to Pat Robertson, from astrologers to psychics.  According to Leviticus, you can kill them by stoning and do so without the consequences of going to jail or, in the afterlife, hell.  I wonder if anyone used this is a defense against murder charges in Biblical times?  “But, your honor, that person was a medium!  The Lord commands us in Leviticus to kill all mediums.”  

As with most Bible verses, believers pick and choose.  An Orthodox Jew still keeps kosher, but he doesn’t murder astrologists.  A fundamentalist Christian claims to follow the Bible, but he ignores the verse about loving one another in favor of the verses that seem to condemn gays.  And to those of us on the outside, deriving meaning from the Bible makes no sense.

Sunday, August 26, 2012

Leviticus 20: 1 to 21

It seems as though it would be much easier to re-read the Bible and write about it if I were actually reading the part I like--the Old Testament--instead of the New Testament, which I find boring (not as many battles, JC says a lot of weird, conflicting things, Paul hates women, and so on).

So I'm thought of following the old practice of picking up the book, closing my eyes, opening it and pointing to a passage, at least as a way to jumpstart my writing.  The trouble is, I can manipulate the results, so I've decided to use a random Bible verse generator.

Yeah, this is definitely more fun.  The verse that the Random Bible Verse generator gave me is this one from Leviticus  20:7-8.  "Consecrate yourselves, therefore, and be holy, for I am the Lord your God.  Keep my statutes and do them; I am the Lord who sanctifies you." Leviticus is a book of laws, and it establishes God as a strict guy.  A lot of the laws concern the commandment that the Israelites should worship only one God.

Let's play a game and see how many of these laws I've broken:

Leviticus 20: 2:  "Any Israelite or any foreigner residing in Israel who sacrifices any of his children to Molek is to be put to death.  The members of the community are to stone him.  3:  I myself will set my face against him and will cut him off from his people; for by sacrificing his children to Molek, he has defiled my sanctuary and profaned my holy name.  4:  If the members of the community close their eyes when that man sacrifices one of his children to Molek and if they fail to put him to death, 5: I myself will set my face against him and his family and will cut them off from their people together with all who follow him in prostituting themselves to Molek."

No problem there.  I don't worship god, let alone Molek, and I've never sacrificed anyone, let alone one of my children.

Leviticus 20: 6:  "I will set my face against anyone who turns to mediums and spiritists to prostittue themselves by following them, and I will cut them off from their people."

No problem there.  I don't believe in mediums and "spiritists" any more than I believe in God.

Leviticus 20: 9:  "Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death.  Because they have cursed their father or mother, their blood will be on their own head."

I am not fond of my parents, but he seems to be talking about cursing them like a witch would.  I had no role in their deaths (one is still living), so there's no problem here.

Then we go into laws related to sex.  Verse 10:  commit adultery, but both the adulterer and the adulteress to death.  Verse 11:  Have sex with your father's wife, both will be put to death.  Verse 12:  Have sex with your daughter-in-law, both will be put to death.  Verse 13: A man has sex with a man, both will die.  Verse 14:  a man marries both a woman and her mother, they all have to be burned in fire.  Verse 15:  a man has sex with an animal, kill both.  Verse 16:  A woman has sex with an animal (or, as it says "approaches an animal to have sexual relations with it", kill both.  Verse 17: A man marries his sister and they have sex, they are to be publicly removed from their people (wow, at least aren't stoned or burned).  Verse 18:  A man has sex with a woman while she's menstruating--cut them off from their people.  Verse 19-20:  Have sex with your aunt, and you're held responsible.  the punishment?  They will die childless.  Verse 21:  Marry your brother's wife, that's impure, and you won't have children.

We were taught in Sunday School that the laws in Leviticus were designed in part to minimize conflict in a nomadic tribe.  I suppose it's good that they spell out clearly what's forbidden and what the punishments were, but since there is no god, I wonder how they made people die childless?

Next time, I'll write about the rest of Leviticus 20.



Sunday, January 1, 2012

An atheist's despair

I took a long-term job subbing for a high school English teacher, and one of the topics we covered was the Bible as literature.  In spite of the teacher's warning (she came into the class to deliver this warning in person), the small class divided itself into believers and non-believers, and the believers were highly offended when one of the non-believers described the Old Testament God as an asshole.  Of course, the offended Christian was too passive to mention it that day--instead, she brought it up the next day, causing all discussion to end, and causing me to deliver a written lecture to them.  One of the examples I gave in support of God being an asshole was this verse, Deuteronomy 6:15:  "For the LORD your God, who is among you, is a jealous God and his anger will burn against you, and he will destroy you from the face of the land."  Sounds pretty obnoxious, doesn't it? Then I spoke for the Christians and said that they would like the non-Christians to know that their conception of God is that he is a loving God, and that the covenant changed with the New Testament.  At least after I read that, they started talking to each other again, but really, how could that girl get upset--God *is* an asshole in the Old Testament--in fact, that's the point.  An omniscient, all-powerful God is going to get grumpy.  He even becomes grumpy enough to flood the planet. This is one of the most annoying traits of Christians--their inability to hear a description that doesn't fit with what they're taught. In this case, it led to oppression of free speech, and to everyone feeling bad, or at least tense.

Notice on this list that the nature of God is described in many different terms, but they leave out grumpy asshole (hey, they even leave out angry, even though God describes himself that way): http://www.godonthe.net/evidence/atribute.htm  

Friday, December 16, 2011

Christopher Hitchens

I never managed to finish a Christopher Hitchens book, and in general, I found that his voice had a droning quality which put me to sleep. But in case you like Hitchens, you might be interested in the links featured on the C-SPAN video library blog.